About

Jill BurkeI’m a lecturer in Italian renaissance art history at the University of Edinburgh, and this blog is a way to get some ideas and thoughts into the public domain before committing them to print, to link to some of the activities I’m involved in, and I’m also planning to post bits and pieces of material that I come across sometimes that I can’t find a place for in articles or books, but which might be useful to other people. You are welcome to use any info – though do reference me please… You’re also very welcome to comment on my posts. There’s more information about me, and links to some of my published work at http://edinburgh.academia.edu/JillBurke

2 Responses to About

  1. Fara Otterbeck says:

    I was wondering if you had more information on your statement, “There’s a particularly memorable recipe in the 1532 book, for example, that recommends women wash the area where hair is to be removed in a mixture of cat dung and vinegar.” I research medieval uses for bodily fluids and various manures. Cat poo isn’t used very often so it is always a fun one to find references on.

  2. Bob Levine says:

    Hi Jill,

    I enjoyed your post as I’ve long puzzled over Michelangelo and the female body. However, even if I accept some of the explanations you posited- the male body being the default model, etc.- I still have problems with the breasts that Michelangelo sculpted on his female figures. Specifically, they don’t look anything like normal breasts! They look like implants gone wrong. I’ve even heard it suggested that he learned female anatomy from (partially decomposed in the mediterranean climate) corpses and so had no idea what the living breast was like. this is plainly evident in the image you chose of ‘Night’- the breasts look positively pathological.

    I am not an art historian but it seems to me this matter could be at least partially resolved if we look at other, contemporaneous, sculptors to see if they did the same thing. I’ve never noticed it anywhere else. Was it just a peculiarity of Michelangelo? If so, broad explanations are hardly necessary. If it was more widespread, then the broader the better!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s