This is just a quick addition to my previous post. One response to Cesariano’s man was a 1536 Italian edition of Vitruvius by Giovanni Battista Caporali. As far as I understand it, the passage about human proportion here was based on Cesariano’s translation, but edited and with new images. You might assume that the potentially problematic erect phallus was omitted in this later edition, but no. It is, however, really quite different from Cesariano’s version. The picture’s to the right. (from the wonderful University of Heidelberg library; the original text is also on http://www.archive.org)
Top Posts & Pages
- Did renaissance women remove their body hair?
- Men with Breasts (Or Why are Michelangelo's Women so Muscular?) Part 1
- Men with Breasts - Michelangelo's women 2
- Leonardo's Measure - The Genitals of Vitruvian Men
- Humanities Research and New Knowledge: Leonardo, Michelangelo and the Battle Scenes in the Hall of the Great Council
- Africa Art art festival battle of naked men Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery body hair body image Bourdieu Cadamosto Cesare Cesariano female nudes feminism Florence Gender Giovanni Battista Caporali Italy Leonardo da Vinci Life drawing Maurizio Seracini Michelangelo names nude Nudes patronage Pisanello Pollaiuolo proportion Rab Hatfield race Renaissance renaissance art renaissance studies Rosso Fiorentino Senegal sexuality vasari Vitruvian Man Vitruvio Ferrarese Vitruvius workshop system